Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663734›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic cytopathology2018

New biological research and understanding of Papanicolaou's test.

Elizabeth R Smith, Sophia H George, Erin Kobetz, Xiang-Xi Xu

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Generation of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cell death in cancer chemotherapy using taxanes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth R SmithDepartment of Cell Biology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, 33136.
Sophia H GeorgeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, 33136.
Erin KobetzDepartment of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, 33136.
Xiang-Xi XuDepartment of Cell Biology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, 33136.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2886-5308

Funding

University of Miami Developmental Center for AIDS Research (D-CFAR)P30AI073961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ALLAN E RODRIGUEZ · 2007 to 2026
$33.8M
Ovarian Cancer: Epithelial DedifferentiationR01CA079716 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI XU, XIANGXI MIKE · 1999 to 2015
$4.8M
Gonadotropins &Cox-2 in Ovarian Cancer PreventionR01CA099471 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI XU, XIANGXI MIKE · 2003 to 2014
$4.0M
Epithelial Positioning Organization and Ovarian CancerR01CA095071 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI XU, XIANGXI MIKE · 2002 to 2010
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079716NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095071NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099471NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI073961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the Papanicolaou smear test by Dr. George Nicholas Papanicolaou (1883-1962) is one of the most significant achievements in screening for disease and cancer prevention in history. The Papanicolaou smear has been used for screening of cervical cancer since the 1950s. The test is technically straightforward and practical and based on a simple scientific observation: malignant cells have an aberrant nuclear morphology that can be distinguished from benign cells. Here, we review the scientific understanding that has been achieved and continues to be made on the causes and consequences of abnormal nuclear morphology, the basis of Dr. Papanicolaou's invention. The deformed nuclear shape is caused by the loss of lamina and nuclear envelope structural proteins. The consequences of a nuclear envelope defect include chromosomal numerical instability, altered chromatin organization and gene expression, and increased cell mobility because of a malleable nuclear envelope. HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) infection is recognized as the key etiology in the development of cervical cancer. Persistent HPV infection causes disruption of the nuclear lamina, which presents as a change in nuclear morphology detectable by a Papanicolaou smear. Thus, the causes and consequences of nuclear deformation are now linked to the mechanisms of viral carcinogenesis, and are still undergoing active investigation to reveal the details. Recently a statue was installed in front of the Papanicolaou's Cancer Research Building to honor the inventor. Remarkably, the invention nearly 60 years ago by Dr. Papanicolaou still exerts clinical impacts and inspires scientific inquiries.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell NucleusHistory, 20th CenturyHumansNeoplasmsPapanicolaou TestBiomarkers, Tumoraneuploidycarcinomascervical cancerchromosomal instabilitydiagnosisHPVLamin A/Cnuclear buddingnuclear deformationnuclear envelopenuclear laminanuclear morphologyPapanicolaou smearpolyploidyprevention

Identifiers

PMID29663734
PMCPMC5949091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.