ArticlePhotochemistry and photobiology2018
Comparison of Blue and White Lamp Light with Sunlight for Daylight-Mediated, 5-ALA Photodynamic Therapy, in vivo.
Article in Photochemistry and photobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A regimen to minimize pain during blue light photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses: Bilaterally controlled, randomized trial of simultaneous versus conventional illumination.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020Trial
- Observational pilot study of multi-wavelength wearable light dosimetry for erythropoietic protoporphyria.International journal of dermatology · 2024Observational
- Advanced Light Source Technologies for Photodynamic Therapy of Skin Cancer Lesions.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- 5-Aminolevrinic Acid Exhibits Dual Effects on Stemness in Human Sarcoma Cell Lines under Dark Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Measurements of illuminance in simulated daylight photodynamic therapy.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Effect of Different Wavelengths of Laser Irradiation on the Skin Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- SmartPDT®: Smartphone enabled real-time dosimetry via satellite observation for daylight photodynamic therapy.Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2020Article
- Weather-informed Light-tissue Model-Based Dose Planning for Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy.Photochemistry and photobiology · 2020Article
- Measuring Daylight: A Review of Dosimetry in Daylight Photodynamic Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Updates on Treatment Approaches for Cutaneous Field Cancerization.Current dermatology reports · 2019Article
- Modeling PpIX effective light fluence at depths into the skin for PDT dose comparison.Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2019Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of White Led-Activated Non-porphyrinic Photosensitizer OR141 in 3D Tumor Spheroids and Mouse Skin Lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy (d-PDT) as a treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) is an increasingly common technique due to a significant reduction in pain, leading to better patient tolerability. While past studies have looked at different light sources and delivery methods, this study strives to provide equivalent PpIX-weighted light doses with the hypothesis that artificial light sources could be equally as effective as natural sunlight if their PpIX-weighted fluences were equalized. Normal mouse skin was used as the model to compare blue LED light, metal halide white light and natural sunlight, with minimal incubation time between topical ALA application and the onset of light delivery. A total PpIX-weighted fluence of 20 J
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.