Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663249›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.

Claudio Mauriello, Elie Chouillard, Antonio d'alessandro, Gianpaolo Marte, Argyri Papadimitriou, Elias Chahine, Radwan Kassir

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudio MaurielloDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Elie ChouillardDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Antonio d'alessandroDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Gianpaolo MarteDepartment of Surgery, Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Argyri PapadimitriouDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Elias ChahineDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Radwan KassirDepartment of Digestive Surgery, CHU Félix Guyon, La réunion, Saint Denis, France. radwankassir42@hotmail.Fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-5272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluate the efficacy of single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) and then compare it to a less-invasive sleeve approach (three-port) (3PSG) according to a propensity score (PS) matching analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed all patients who underwent SG through a three-port or a single-port laparoscopic approach.

resultsAfter 2 years, the follow-up was completed in 84% patients treated with 3PSG and 95% patients of the SPSG group. Excess weight loss (EWL) was comparable for the first year of follow-up within the two groups except for the controls at 3 months in which the SPSG group showed a higher EWL (p = 0.0243).

conclusionWe demonstrated the efficacy of SPSG in bariatric surgery even compared to another, less invasive, laparoscopic SG approach (three-port).

Indexed as

AdultBariatric SurgeryCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossExcess weight lossPort conventional laparoscopicPropensity score adjustment analysisSingle portSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.