Moving Past the Rose-Tinted Lens of Monogamy: Onward with Critical Self-Examination and (Sexually) Healthy Science.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships.Archives of sexual behavior · 2021
   Article
2. Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships.Archives of sexual behavior · 2021
   Article
3. Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
   Article
4. Life History and Multi-Partner Mating: A Novel Explanation for Moral Stigma Against Consensual Non-monogamy.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to Commentaries.2019
• Comment on
  Rethinking Risk, Culture, and Intervention in Collective Sex Environments.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as