Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663134›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2018

Profound seasonal changes in brain size and architecture in the common shrew.

Javier Lázaro, Moritz Hertel, Chet C Sherwood, Marion Muturi, Dina K N Dechmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Invariant HVC size in female canaries singing under testosterone: Unlocking function through neural differentiation, not growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Day-night and seasonal variation of human gene expression across tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javier LázaroDepartment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany. jlazaro@orn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1958-6470
Moritz HertelDepartment of Behavioural Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany.
Chet C SherwoodDepartment of Anthropology, The George Washington University, 20052, Washington, DC, USA.
Marion MuturiDepartment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Dina K N DechmannDepartment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The seasonal changes in brain size of some shrews represent the most drastic reversible transformation in the mammalian central nervous system known to date. Brain mass decreases 10-26% from summer to winter and regrows 9-16% in spring, but the underlying structural changes at the cellular level are not yet understood. Here, we describe the volumetric differences in brain structures between seasons and sexes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in detail, confirming that changes in different brain regions vary in the magnitude of change. Notably, shrews show a decrease in hypothalamus, thalamus, and hippocampal volume and later regrowth in spring, whereas neocortex and striatum volumes decrease in winter and do not recover in size. For some regions, males and females showed different patterns of seasonal change from each other. We also analyzed the underlying changes in neuron morphology. We observed a general decrease in soma size and total dendrite volume in the caudoputamen and anterior cingulate cortex. This neuronal retraction may partially explain the overall tissue shrinkage in winter. While not sufficient to explain the entire seasonal process, it represents a first step toward understanding the mechanisms beneath this remarkable phenomenon.

Indexed as

SeasonsAge FactorsAnimalsBrainBrain MappingDendritesFemaleMaleNeural PathwaysNeuronsSex FactorsShrewsSilver StainingBrain anatomyBrain massDehnel’s phenomenonDendritic plasticityNeuron atrophyTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID29663134
PMCPMC5995987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.