Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663130›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2019

Differences in modal distortion in time perception due to working memory capacity: a response with a developmental study in children and adults.

Sylvie Droit-Volet, Quentin Hallez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvie Droit-VoletUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire de psychologie sociale et cognitive, CNRS, UMR 6024, 34 avenue carnot, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Sylvie.droit-volet@uca.fr.
Quentin HallezUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire de psychologie sociale et cognitive, CNRS, UMR 6024, 34 avenue carnot, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive · FR

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (BE) H2020- FETPROACT-2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested the modality effect on time judgment in a bisection task in children and adults when auditory and visual stimuli were presented in the same session. Cognitive capacities of children and adults were assessed with different neuropsychological tests. The results showed a modality effect, with the auditory stimuli judged longer than the visual stimuli. However, this modality distortion in time judgment was higher in the younger children. Statistical analyses revealed that the size of this time distortion was directly related to individual working memory capacities.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionIllusionsMemory, Short-TermTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAgingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29663130
OpenAlexW2802303664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.