Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663122›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2018

Worldwide assessment of healthcare personnel dealing with lymphoedema.

Henrike Schulze, Marisa Nacke, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Catarina Hadamitzky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Topical tissue nanotransfection ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrike SchulzeClinic of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. henrikeschulze@hotmail.de.
Marisa NackeCancer Research UK, Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK.
Christoph GutenbrunnerClinic of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Catarina HadamitzkyPractice for Lympho-Vascular Diseases, Bahnhofstraße 12, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECancer Research UK Scotland Institute · GB

Funding

European Union 527658-LLP-1-2012-1-DE-ERASMUS-ESMO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphoedema is a pandemic with about 250 million people suffering from this condition worldwide. Lymphatic diseases have considerable public health significance, but yet few professionals are specialised in their management causing a substantial burden on health resources. AIMS AND

objectivesThis study aims to give an overview of the approximate number of medical professionals, professional societies, institutions and companies dealing with lymphoedema in various countries. Concepts of improvement for current human resources are considered.

methodsAn online database analysis (Google search engine and PubMed) was carried out for each country of the world. Additionally, relevant congress participant lists as well as member lists of significant medical societies and reports of the World Health Organisation were analysed.

resultsOverall distribution of tertiary level professionals specialised in this field is heterogenous. A decrescent gradient of professionals can be seen between developed and developing countries and between urban and rural areas. Countries in general do not seem to have yet met the current demand for specialists at tertiary level in this field.

conclusionsThis study intends to draw attention to the current medical coverage gaps due to a low number of lymphoedema specialists at tertiary level. It wishes to start a discussion about structured reimbursement and certification of knowledge and skills that are essential incentives for experts to act as multiplicators and change the lack of care in the mid-term. Current fail prescriptions and evitable disability and sick certificates represent a high financial burden that could be reinvested in a correct management. Policy makers must focus in the two above mentioned essential measures. Medical training and the consequent development of the industry will then naturally take place, as it was the case for other professional groups in the past.

Indexed as

Lymphatic diseasesLymphoedemaLymphologyMedical educationMedical healthcare resources

Identifiers

PMID29663122
PMCPMC5901432
OpenAlexW2805590386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.