Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663118›Full record

SynthesisJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2018

Urban Health Indicator Tools of the Physical Environment: a Systematic Review.

Helen Pineo, Ketevan Glonti, Harry Rutter, Nici Zimmermann, Paul Wilkinson, Michael Davies

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HealthyPlan.City: A Web Tool to Support Urban Environmental Equity and Public Health in Canadian Communities.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Advancing Population Health Through Open Environmental Data Platforms.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens-The Case of Warsaw.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Participatory Systems Mapping for Municipal Prioritization and Planning.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Era on Residential Property Features: Pilot Studies in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Operationalising the 20-minute neighbourhood.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Article
  20. Urban areas, human health and technosols for the green deal.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen PineoInstitute of Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK. helen.pineo.15@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-3022
Ketevan GlontiSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Harry RutterCentre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Nici ZimmermannInstitute of Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK.
Paul WilkinsonDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Michael DaviesInstitute of Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban health indicator (UHI) tools provide evidence about the health impacts of the physical urban environment which can be used in built environment policy and decision-making. Where UHI tools provide data at the neighborhood (and lower) scale they can provide valuable information about health inequalities and environmental deprivation. This review performs a census of UHI tools and explores their nature and characteristics (including how they represent, simplify or address complex systems) to increase understanding of their potential use by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers. We searched seven bibliographic databases, four key journals and six practitioner websites and conducted Google searches between January 27, 2016 and February 24, 2016 for UHI tools. We extracted data from primary studies and online indicator systems. We included 198 documents which identified 145 UHI tools comprising 8006 indicators, from which we developed a taxonomy. Our taxonomy classifies the significant diversity of UHI tools with respect to topic, spatial scale, format, scope and purpose. The proportions of UHI tools which measure data at the neighborhood and lower scale, and present data via interactive maps, have both increased over time. This is particularly relevant to built environment policy and decision-makers, reflects growing analytical capability and offers the potential for improved understanding of the complexity of influences on urban health (an aspect noted as a particular challenge by some indicator producers). The relation between urban health indicators and health impacts attributable to modifiable environmental characteristics is often indirect. Furthermore, the use of UHI tools in policy and decision-making appears to be limited, thus raising questions about the continued development of such tools by multiple organisations duplicating scarce resources. Further research is needed to understand the requirements of built environment policy and decision-makers, public health professionals and local communities regarding the form and presentation of indicators which support their varied objectives.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsCitiesDecision MakingHumansPublic HealthQuality Indicators, Health CareResidence CharacteristicsUrban HealthBuilt environmentEvidenceHealthy citiesIndicatorIndicesPolicySocial determinants of healthUrban healthUrban metricsUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID29663118
PMCPMC6181826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.