ReviewJournal of medical systems2018
State of the Art on the Use of Portable Digital Devices to Assess Stress in Humans.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Daily Probiotics Supplementation on Anxiety Induced Physiological Parameters among Competitive Football Players.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Screen time and myopia: A serial multiple mediator SEM analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Impact of Nationality on the Psychophysiological Stress Response and Academic Fulfilment in the Final Degree Dissertation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Monitorization of Autonomic Stress Response of Nurse Students in Hospital Clinical Simulation.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- [Psychological treatment of headache in times of COVID-19].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
- Effect of Stress on Autonomic and Cardiovascular Systems in Military Population: A Systematic Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2020Review
- Modulators of the Personal and Professional Threat Perception of Olympic Athletes in the Actual COVID-19 Crisis.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Analysis of Psychophysiological Stress Response in Higher Education Students Undergoing Clinical Practice Evaluation.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Central Fatigue by the Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold in Cyclists.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Psychophysiological Patterns Related to Success in a Special Operation Selection Course.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to review the current tools for the assessment of stress response in humans, ranging from the use of psychological questionnaires to the latest tools involving portable digital devices. Practical implications in educational context are further discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.