Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29663032›Full record

ReviewPlant cell reports2018

Arabidopsis: the original plant chassis organism.

Cynthia K Holland, Joseph M Jez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant cell reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Fine-Tuning ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Plant Heterotrophic Cultures: No Food, No Growth.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Unraveling the Mechanism of StWRKY6 in Potato (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Biosynthetic approaches to efficient assimilation of COFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia K HollandDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Joseph M JezDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. jjez@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7911-9108

Funding

Division of Graduate Education 1143954Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences 1614539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress) has a past, current, and future role in the era of synthetic biology. Arabidopsis is one of the most well-studied plants with a wealth of genomics, genetics, and biochemical resources available for the metabolic engineer and synthetic biologist. Here we discuss the tools and resources that enable the identification of target genes and pathways in Arabidopsis and heterologous expression in this model plant. While there are numerous examples of engineering Arabidopsis for decreased lignin, increased seed oil, increased vitamins, and environmental remediation, this plant has provided biochemical tools for introducing Arabidopsis genes, pathways, and/or regulatory elements into other plants and microorganisms. Arabidopsis is not a vegetative or oilseed crop, but it is as an excellent model chassis for proof-of-concept metabolic engineering and synthetic biology experiments in plants.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisGene Expression Regulation, PlantMetabolic EngineeringSynthetic BiologyArabidopsis thalianaChassis organismGenome resourcesMetabolic engineeringPlant biochemistrySynthetic biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.