ArticleDer Internist2018
[Retrieval of a migrated plastic stent in a 51-year-old man].
Article in Der Internist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndosonographically guided transgastric drainage is the first-line interventional therapy of walled-off necrosis and symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts in necrotizing pancreatitis. Plastic stents or lumen apposing metal stents are commonly used. A possible complication of endoscopic therapy is stent migration. CASE REPORT: We report upon a 51-year-old man who presented with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Transgastric necrosectomy was performed and 5 transmural double-pigtail stents (DPS) were left in situ to drain the residual retroperitoneal cavity. The patient recovered and 4 stents were endoscopically removed 5 weeks later on an outpatient basis, whereas the fifth stent was suspected to have passed spontaneously via the natural route. The asymptomatic patient presented 3 months later for follow-up computed tomography. The necrosis had healed but one DPS was seen beyond the gastric wall near the kidney. Transmural access to the stent could be achieved by an endosonographically guided puncture toward the proximal portion of the stent followed by placement of a hydrophilic guidewire alongside the stent. A new gastrostomy was created by using a 6F cystotome followed by wire-guided dilation with a 12 mm balloon. The stent could then be grasped with transmurally inserted rat-tooth forceps and repositioned across the gastrostomy site. The patient was given prophylactic antibiotics. After removal of the stent, the patient could be discharged.
conclusionHerein, we present the successful endosonographically guided transmural removal of a retroperitoneally migrated plastic stent. Of note, in our patient we had to rely completely on endosonography and radiography for localization and targeting of the stent, since the former necrotic cavity had meanwhile completely healed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.