Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662940›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Large Scale

Kim I Chisholm, Nikita Khovanov, Douglas M Lopes, Federica La Russa, Stephen B McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Brain communications · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. I Feel! Therefore, I Am from Pain to Consciousness in DOC Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim I ChisholmNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-8966
Nikita KhovanovNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4710-9025
Douglas M LopesNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-9199
Federica La RussaNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-6566
Stephen B McMahonNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-5536

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102645/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater emphasis on the study of intact cellular networks in their physiological environment has led to rapid advances in intravital imaging of the central nervous system (CNS), while the peripheral system remains largely unexplored. To assess large networks of sensory neurons, we selectively label primary afferents with GCaMP6s in male and female C57bl/6 mice and visualize their functional responses to peripheral stimulation

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesMicroscopyAnimalsDependovirusFemaleGanglia, SpinalGenetic VectorsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNerve Tissue ProteinsNociceptionPhysical StimulationSciatic NerveSensory Receptor CellsTime FactorsNerve Tissue Proteinsdorsal root gangliagenetically encoded calcium indicatorsin vivo imagingnociceptionpainprimary afferents

Identifiers

PMID29662940
PMCPMC5898788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.