Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662649›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Patricia de Cremoux, Lucie Biard, Brigitte Poirot, Philippe Bertheau, Luis Teixeira, Jacqueline Lehmann-Che, Fatiha A Bouhidel, Pascal Merlet, Marc Espié, Matthieu Resche-Rigon and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Superiority ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia de CremouxMolecular Oncology Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Lucie BiardDepartment of Biostatistics, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Brigitte PoirotMolecular Oncology Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Philippe BertheauDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Luis TeixeiraUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
Jacqueline Lehmann-CheMolecular Oncology Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Fatiha A BouhidelDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Pascal MerletDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Marc EspiéUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
Matthieu Resche-RigonDepartment of Biostatistics, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Christos SotiriouBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
David GroheuxUniversity Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM/CNRS UMR944/7212, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 7 · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRInserm · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in advanced luminal breast cancer patients is difficult to predict. Intrinsic properties of breast tumors, including altered gene expression profile and dynamic evaluation of metabolic properties of tumor cells using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of tumor cells, have been identified to guide patient's prognosis. The aim of this study is to determine if both analyses may improve the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive / HER2-negative breast cancers (BCs) patients.

methodsWe used metabolic PET parameters, at diagnosis and after two cycles of chemotherapy and proliferation gene expression profile on biopsy at diagnosis, in particular, the genomic grade index (GGI) analyzed by reverse transcription and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The pathological response was the surrogate endpoint.

resultsThe change of FDG uptake between baseline PET and interim PET after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ΔSUVmax) was highly associated with pCR (p=0.008). We also observed an ability of P53 mutated status (p=0.042), in addition to histological grade (p=0. 0004), and PR expression (p=0.01) to predict pCR in ER-positive BCs, whereas no proliferation marker predicted pCR (P=0.39 for GGI). Finally, only ΔSUVmax was significantly associated with event free survival (p=0.047).

conclusionsOur results confirm the predictive and prognostic value of tumor ΔSUVmax in ER-positive /HER2-negative advanced BCs patients. These findings can be helpful to select high-risk patients within trials investigating novel treatment strategies.

Indexed as

18FDG-PET/CTbreast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responseTP53 status

Identifiers

PMID29662649
PMCPMC5893244
OpenAlexW2795361394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.