ArticleOncotarget2018
A gene expression signature predicts recurrence-free survival in meningioma.
Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Association of Neuro-Oncology guideline on molecular testing of meningiomas for targeted therapy selection.Neuro-oncology · 2025Guideline
- New insights into the role of tetraspanin 6, 7, and 8 in physiology and pathology.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- The Evolving Classification of Meningiomas: Integration of Molecular Discoveries to Inform Patient Care.Cancers · 2024Review
- Detection of diagnostic and prognostic methylation-based signatures in liquid biopsy specimens from patients with meningiomas.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Meningiomas.Cancers · 2023Article
- Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for meningiomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023Article
- Hypermitotic meningiomas harbor DNA methylation subgroups with distinct biological and clinical features.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Molecular classification and grading of meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Expressions of Progesterone Receptor of Orbital Meningiomas in Indonesia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Observational
- Article
- Consensus core clinical data elements for meningiomas (v2021.1).Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Glutamine anaplerosis is required for amino acid biosynthesis in human meningiomas.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomic Model for the Noninvasive Preoperative Differentiation Between Transitional and Atypical Meningiomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The Prognostic Value of Methylation Signatures andCancers · 2021Article
- Article
- A Prognostic Gene-Expression Signature and Risk Score for Meningioma Recurrence After Resection.Neurosurgery · 2020Article
- A radiomics model for preoperative prediction of brain invasion in meningioma non-invasively based on MRI: A multicentre study.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs in Radioresistant and Radiosensitive Atypical Meningioma: A Clinical Study in Chinese Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Review
- Semaphorin 3C as a Therapeutic Target in Prostate and Other Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeningioma is the most common primary brain tumor and has a variable risk of local recurrence. While World Health Organization (WHO) grade generally correlates with recurrence, there is substantial within-grade variation of recurrence risk. Current risk stratification does not accurately predict which patients are likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). We hypothesized that tumors at risk for recurrence have unique gene expression profiles (GEP) that could better select patients for adjuvant RT.
methodsWe developed a recurrence predictor by machine learning modeling using a training/validation approach.
resultsThree publicly available AffymetrixU133 gene expression datasets (GSE9438, GSE16581, GSE43290) combining 127 primary, non-treated meningiomas of all grades served as the training set. Unsupervised variable selection was used to identify an 18-gene GEP model (18-GEP) that separated recurrences. This model was validated on 62 primary, non-treated cases with similar grade and clinical variable distribution as the training set. When applied to the validation set, 18-GEP separated recurrences with a misclassification error rate of 0.25 (log-rank p=0.0003). 18-GEP was predictive for tumor recurrence [p=0.0008, HR=4.61, 95%CI=1.89-11.23)] and was predictive after adjustment for WHO grade, mitotic index, sex, tumor location, and Simpson grade [p=0.0311, HR=9.28, 95%CI=(1.22-70.29)]. The expression signature included genes encoding proteins involved in normal embryonic development, cell proliferation, tumor growth and invasion (FGF9, SEMA3C, EDNRA), angiogenesis (angiopoietin-2), cell cycle regulation (CDKN1A), membrane signaling (tetraspanin-7, caveolin-2), WNT-pathway inhibitors (DKK3), complement system (C1QA) and neurotransmitter regulation (SLC1A3, Secretogranin-II).
conclusions18-GEP accurately stratifies patients with meningioma by recurrence risk having the potential to guide the use of adjuvant RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.