Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662628›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

A gene expression signature predicts recurrence-free survival in meningioma.

Adriana Olar, Lindsey D Goodman, Khalida M Wani, Nicholas S Boehling, Devi S Sharma, Reema R Mody, Joy Gumin, Elizabeth B Claus, Frederick F Lang, Timothy F Cloughesy and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for meningiomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Expressions of Progesterone Receptor of Orbital Meningiomas in Indonesia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Semaphorin 3C as a Therapeutic Target in Prostate and Other Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriana OlarMedical University of South Carolina & Hollings Cancer Center, Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine & Neurosurgery, Charleston, SC, USA.
Lindsey D GoodmanNeurosciences Graduate Group, Perlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biology, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Khalida M WaniThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Houston, TX, USA.
Nicholas S BoehlingSt. Charles Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bend, OR, USA.
Devi S SharmaThe University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Reema R ModyThe University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joy GuminThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth B ClausBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Neurosurgery, Boston, MA, USA.
Frederick F LangThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Timothy F CloughesyThe University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Albert LaiThe University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kenneth D AldapeMacFeeters-Hamilton Brain Tumour Centre, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Franco DeMonteThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Erik P SulmanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USMedical University of South Carolina · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASt. Charles Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USYale University · US

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
Multidisciplinary Subspecialty Pathology Research Fellowship ProgramT32CA163185 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CZERNIAK, BOGDAN A, KEYOMARSI, KHANDAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningioma is the most common primary brain tumor and has a variable risk of local recurrence. While World Health Organization (WHO) grade generally correlates with recurrence, there is substantial within-grade variation of recurrence risk. Current risk stratification does not accurately predict which patients are likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). We hypothesized that tumors at risk for recurrence have unique gene expression profiles (GEP) that could better select patients for adjuvant RT.

methodsWe developed a recurrence predictor by machine learning modeling using a training/validation approach.

resultsThree publicly available AffymetrixU133 gene expression datasets (GSE9438, GSE16581, GSE43290) combining 127 primary, non-treated meningiomas of all grades served as the training set. Unsupervised variable selection was used to identify an 18-gene GEP model (18-GEP) that separated recurrences. This model was validated on 62 primary, non-treated cases with similar grade and clinical variable distribution as the training set. When applied to the validation set, 18-GEP separated recurrences with a misclassification error rate of 0.25 (log-rank p=0.0003). 18-GEP was predictive for tumor recurrence [p=0.0008, HR=4.61, 95%CI=1.89-11.23)] and was predictive after adjustment for WHO grade, mitotic index, sex, tumor location, and Simpson grade [p=0.0311, HR=9.28, 95%CI=(1.22-70.29)]. The expression signature included genes encoding proteins involved in normal embryonic development, cell proliferation, tumor growth and invasion (FGF9, SEMA3C, EDNRA), angiogenesis (angiopoietin-2), cell cycle regulation (CDKN1A), membrane signaling (tetraspanin-7, caveolin-2), WNT-pathway inhibitors (DKK3), complement system (C1QA) and neurotransmitter regulation (SLC1A3, Secretogranin-II).

conclusions18-GEP accurately stratifies patients with meningioma by recurrence risk having the potential to guide the use of adjuvant RT.

Indexed as

affymetrixgene expressionmeningiomapredictor algorithmrecurrence risk

Identifiers

PMID29662628
PMCPMC5882319
OpenAlexW2790325978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.