Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662502›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2018

Sex-Dependent Effects of Developmental Lead Exposure on the Brain.

Garima Singh, Vikrant Singh, Marissa Sobolewski, Deborah A Cory-Slechta, Jay S Schneider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Childhood lead exposure and sleep problems in adolescents: a longitudinal cohort study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AIMS neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Garima SinghDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Vikrant SinghDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Marissa SobolewskiDepartment of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Deborah A Cory-SlechtaDepartment of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Jay S SchneiderDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Sally W Thurston · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Environment and Gene Effects on Brain and BehaviorR01ES015295 · NIEHS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNEIDER, JAY S · 2008 to 2017
$5.1M
CNS Glucocorticoid Epigenetic Changes of Pb Stress EffectsR01ES021534 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CORY-SLECHTA, DEBORAH A, SCHNEIDER, JAY S · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015295NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of sex as an effect modifier of developmental lead (Pb) exposure has until recently received little attention. Lead exposure in early life can affect brain development with persisting influences on cognitive and behavioral functioning, as well as, elevated risks for developing a variety of diseases and disorders in later life. Although both sexes are affected by Pb exposure, the incidence, manifestation, and severity of outcomes appears to differ in males and females. Results from epidemiologic and animal studies indicate significant effect modification by sex, however, the results are not consistent across studies. Unfortunately, only a limited number of human epidemiological studies have included both sexes in independent outcome analyses limiting our ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding sex-differentiated outcomes. Additionally, due to various methodological differences across studies, there is still not a good mechanistic understanding of the molecular effects of lead on the brain and the factors that influence differential responses to Pb based on sex. In this review, focused on prenatal and postnatal Pb exposures in humans and animal models, we discuss current literature supporting sex differences in outcomes in response to Pb exposure and explore some of the ideas regarding potential molecular mechanisms that may contribute to sex-related differences in outcomes from developmental Pb exposure. The sex-dependent variability in outcomes from developmental Pb exposure may arise from a combination of complex factors, including, but not limited to, intrinsic sex-specific molecular/genetic mechanisms and external risk factors including sex-specific responses to environmental stressors which may act through shared epigenetic pathways to influence the genome and behavioral output.

Indexed as

braindevelopmental exposureepigeneticsgeneleadneurotoxicityprenatal stresssex

Identifiers

PMID29662502
PMCPMC5890196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.