Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662458›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Inhibition, Updating Working Memory, and Shifting Predict Reading Disability Symptoms in a Hybrid Model: Project KIDS.

Mia C Daucourt, Christopher Schatschneider, Carol M Connor, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Sara A Hart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the Educational Sciences.Journal of experimental education · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Open Science in Education Sciences.Journal of learning disabilities · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mia C DaucourtDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Christopher SchatschneiderDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Carol M ConnorSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Stephanie Al OtaibaDepartment of Teaching and Learning, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.
Sara A HartDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Florida State University · USSouthern Methodist University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Exploring Individual Differences in Response to InterventionR21HD072286 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HART, SARA ANN · 2013 to 2014
$393k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD072286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent achievement research suggests that executive function (EF), a set of regulatory processes that control both thought and action necessary for goal-directed behavior, is related to typical and atypical reading performance. This project examines the relation of EF, as measured by its components, Inhibition, Updating Working Memory, and Shifting, with a hybrid model of reading disability (RD). Our sample included 420 children who participated in a broader intervention project when they were in KG-third grade (age

Indexed as

executive functionhybrid modelinhibitionreadingreading disabilityshiftingupdatingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID29662458
PMCPMC5890166
OpenAlexW2792850175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.