ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2014
Observation of spermatozoa by a high-magnification microscope.
Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viscous Cervical Environment-on-a-Chip for Selecting High-Quality Sperm from Human Semen.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- High-throughput sperm assay using label-free microscopy: morphometric comparison between different sperm structures of boar and stallion spermatozoa.Animal reproduction science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semen analyses are the primary tool for evaluating male infertility, as semen parameters are useful for predicting potential fertility. In the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART), the single best motile spermatozoon should be selected, especially when performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In this context, the motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) was developed as a method of assessing the detailed morphology of motile spermatozoa in real time at a magnification of up to 6,300× on a video system. The use of ICSI with MSOME-selected sperm is called intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). IMSI improves the outcomes of ICSI. MSOME can be also applied to evaluate male infertility. Among MSOME parameters, the presence of sperm nuclear vacuoles is the most important finding. Large sperm nuclear vacuoles (LNV) are related not only to poor ART outcomes, but also to poor semen quality and sperm DNA damage, such as DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation failure. It has been suggested that sperm head vacuoles are produced at earlier stages of sperm maturation. It is possible that the number of LNV can be decreased by surgical or medical treatment for male infertility. Therefore, the level of LNV has the potential to be used as an alternative parameter of semen quality and a new tool for evaluating the therapeutic effects of treatment in male patients with infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.