ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2012
Prevalence of cases of
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and uterine cervix characteristics of women with Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma in genital discharge.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Prevalence ofBiomedical reports · 2023Article
- Burden of Disease of Gonorrhoea in Latin America: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2023Review
- Article
- Prevalence of selected sexually transmitted infectious agents in a cohort of asymptomatic soldiers in Austria.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Prevalence ofInfectious disease reports · 2022Article
- Sequence analysis reveals asymptomatic infection withInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2021Article
- The Role of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Options.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of Methods: A total of 106 women without gynecologic complaints and in reproductive age were evaluated. DNA was extracted from cells of the genitourinary tract with bacteria for the detection of six types of bacteria by polymerase chain reaction. Results: We found that 11.3 % of women had infection with Conclusion: The data showed a low percentage of women with genitourinary tract bacteria without symptoms. However, these infections can be sexually transmitted, and relate to infertility and other serious illnesses. The identification and treatment of infection in asymptomatic woman can avoid transmission and future genitourinary trait complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.