Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662218›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2018

Tapping the RNA world for therapeutics.

Judy Lieberman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Functional-genomic prioritization identifiesFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epitranscriptomic alterations induced by environmental toxins: implications for RNA modifications and disease.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
  15. Clinical applications of oligonucleotides for cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. CRISPR-Cas Systems: A Functional Perspective and Innovations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Judy LiebermanProgram in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. judy.lieberman@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

Aptamer-siRNA gene knockdown to treat epithelial triple negative breast cancerR01CA184718 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIEBERMAN, JUDY · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent revolution in RNA biology has led to the identification of new RNA classes with unanticipated functions, new types of RNA modifications, an unexpected multiplicity of alternative transcripts and widespread transcription of extragenic regions. This development in basic RNA biology has spawned a corresponding revolution in RNA-based strategies to generate new types of therapeutics. Here, I review RNA-based drug design and discuss barriers to broader applications and possible ways to overcome them. Because they target nucleic acids rather than proteins, RNA-based drugs promise to greatly extend the domain of 'druggable' targets beyond what can be achieved with small molecules and biologics.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingCRISPR-Cas SystemsDrug DesignHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Small InterferingRNARNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID29662218
PMCPMC6052442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.