Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662217›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2018

The functional organization of cortical feedback inputs to primary visual cortex.

Tiago Marques, Julia Nguyen, Gabriela Fioreze, Leopoldo Petreanu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Responses to Pattern-Violating Visual Stimuli Evolve Differently Over Days in Somata and Distal Apical Dendrites.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiago MarquesChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-0549
Julia NguyenChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9337-2182
Gabriela FiorezeChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Leopoldo PetreanuChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal. leopoldo.petreanu@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-4691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical feedback is thought to mediate cognitive processes like attention, prediction, and awareness. Understanding its function requires identifying the organizational logic of feedback axons relaying different signals. We measured retinotopic specificity in inputs from the lateromedial visual area in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) by mapping receptive fields in feedback boutons and relating them to those of neurons in their vicinity. Lateromedial visual area inputs in layer 1 targeted, on average, retinotopically matched locations in V1, but many of them relayed distal visual information. Orientation-selective axons overspread around the retinotopically matched location perpendicularly to their preferred orientation. Direction-selective axons were biased to visual areas shifted from the retinotopically matched position along the angle of their antipreferred direction. Our results show that feedback inputs show tuning-dependent retinotopic specificity. By targeting locations that would be activated by stimuli orthogonal to or opposite to a cell's own tuning, feedback could potentially enhance visual representations in time and space.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBrain MappingFeedback, PhysiologicalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationRetinaVisual CortexVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.