Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662187›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2018

Designing macrocyclic disulfide-rich peptides for biotechnological applications.

Conan K Wang, David J Craik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibody Hotspot-CentricACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. De novo discovery of bicyclic cysteine-rich peptides targeting gasdermin D.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Conan K WangInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David J CraikInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. d.craik@imb.uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0007-6796

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioactive peptides have potential as drug leads, but turning them into drugs is a challenge because of their typically poor metabolic stability. Molecular grafting is one approach to stabilizing and constraining peptides and involves melding a bioactive peptide sequence onto a suitable molecular scaffold. This method has the benefit of improving the stability of the bioactive peptide lead and potentially expanding its functionality. Here we step through the molecular grafting process and describe its successes and limitations. So far, molecular grafting has been successfully used to improve the stability of peptide drug leads, to enhance conformational rigidity, to facilitate delivery to intracellular targets, and in some cases to increase efficacy in oral administration. Although applications of molecular grafting have focused mainly on therapeutic applications, including those for pain, metabolic disease, and cancer, its potential uses are much broader, and we hope this Perspective will inspire wider applications of this molecular design tool in biotechnology.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsBiotechnologyDisulfidesEpitopesHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMiceMutagenesisNeoplasmsPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesProtein ConformationDisulfidesEpitopesPeptide HydrolasesPeptides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.