Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29662101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Gymnosperms on the EDGE.

Félix Forest, Justin Moat, Elisabeth Baloch, Neil A Brummitt, Steve P Bachman, Steffi Ickert-Bond, Peter M Hollingsworth, Aaron Liston, Damon P Little, Sarah Mathews and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom. f.forest@kew.org.
Justin MoatRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-3615
Elisabeth BalochRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom.
Neil A BrummittDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Steve P BachmanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1085-6075
Steffi Ickert-BondUniversity of Alaska Museum, University of Alaska, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-6960, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8198-8898
Peter M HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, United Kingdom.
Aaron ListonDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2082 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-2902, USA.
Damon P LittleThe New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, 10458-5126, USA.
Sarah MathewsCSIRO Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Hardeep RaiDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, Utah, 84322, USA.
Catarina RydinBergius Foundation, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dennis W StevensonThe New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, 10458-5126, USA.
Philip ThomasRoyal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, United Kingdom.
Sven BuerkiDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by limited resources and a sense of urgency, the prioritization of species for conservation has been a persistent concern in conservation science. Gymnosperms (comprising ginkgo, conifers, cycads, and gnetophytes) are one of the most threatened groups of living organisms, with 40% of the species at high risk of extinction, about twice as many as the most recent estimates for all plants (i.e. 21.4%). This high proportion of species facing extinction highlights the urgent action required to secure their future through an objective prioritization approach. The Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) method rapidly ranks species based on their evolutionary distinctiveness and the extinction risks they face. EDGE is applied to gymnosperms using a phylogenetic tree comprising DNA sequence data for 85% of gymnosperm species (923 out of 1090 species), to which the 167 missing species were added, and IUCN Red List assessments available for 92% of species. The effect of different extinction probability transformations and the handling of IUCN data deficient species on the resulting rankings is investigated. Although top entries in our ranking comprise species that were expected to score well (e.g. Wollemia nobilis, Ginkgo biloba), many were unexpected (e.g. Araucaria araucana). These results highlight the necessity of using approaches that integrate evolutionary information in conservation science.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesCycadopsidaDNA, PlantExtinction, BiologicalPhylogenyProbabilityDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID29662101
PMCPMC5902588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.