Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661978›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2018

Control of cell behaviour through nanovibrational stimulation: nanokicking.

Shaun N Robertson, Paul Campsie, Peter G Childs, Fiona Madsen, Hannah Donnelly, Fiona L Henriquez, William G Mackay, Manuel Salmerón-Sánchez, Monica P Tsimbouri, Craig Williams and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical Phenotyping of MG63s Following Vibrational Stimulation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mechanotransduction in osteogenesis.Bone & joint research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The promises of gravitational-wave astronomy.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shaun N RobertsonSUPA, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills, 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Paul CampsieSUPA, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills, 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Peter G ChildsDivision of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Fiona MadsenInstitute of Healthcare, Policy and Practice, School of Health, Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK.
Hannah DonnellyCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute for Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Fiona L HenriquezInstitute of Biomedical and Environmental Health Research, School of Science and Sport, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK.
William G MackayInstitute of Healthcare, Policy and Practice, School of Health, Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK.
Manuel Salmerón-SánchezDivision of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Monica P TsimbouriCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute for Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Craig WilliamsInstitute of Healthcare, Policy and Practice, School of Health, Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK.
Matthew J DalbyCentre for Cell Engineering, Institute for Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK matthew.dalby@glasgow.ac.uk.
Stuart ReidSUPA, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills, 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK stuart.reid@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-3507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical signals are ubiquitous in our everyday life and the process of converting these mechanical signals into a biological signalling response is known as mechanotransduction. Our understanding of mechanotransduction, and its contribution to vital cellular responses, is a rapidly expanding field of research involving complex processes that are still not clearly understood. The use of mechanical vibration as a stimulus of mechanotransduction, including variation of frequency and amplitude, allows an alternative method to control specific cell behaviour without chemical stimulation (e.g. growth factors). Chemical-independent control of cell behaviour could be highly advantageous for fields including drug discovery and clinical tissue engineering. In this review, a novel technique is described based on nanoscale sinusoidal vibration. Using finite-element analysis in conjunction with laser interferometry, techniques that are used within the field of gravitational wave detection, optimization of apparatus design and calibration of vibration application have been performed. We further discuss the application of nanovibrational stimulation, or 'nanokicking', to eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells including the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards an osteoblast cell lineage. Mechanotransductive mechanisms are discussed including mediation through the Rho-A kinase signalling pathway. Optimization of this technique was first performed in two-dimensional culture using a simple vibration platform with an optimal frequency and amplitude of 1 kHz and 22 nm. A novel bioreactor was developed to scale up cell production, with recent research demonstrating that mesenchymal stem cell differentiation can be efficiently triggered in soft gel constructs. This important step provides first evidence that clinically relevant (three-dimensional) volumes of osteoblasts can be produced for the purpose of bone grafting, without complex scaffolds and/or chemical induction. Initial findings have shown that nanovibrational stimulation can also reduce biofilm formation in a number of clinically relevant bacteria. This demonstrates additional utility of the bioreactor to investigate mechanotransduction in other fields of research.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The promises of gravitational-wave astronomy'.

Indexed as

bacteriagravitational wavesmechanotransductionmesenchymal stem cellsnanokickingnanovibrational stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29661978
PMCPMC5915650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.