Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661886›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2018

Distinct

Max C Richter, Susann Ludewig, Alex Winschel, Tobias Abel, Charlotte Bold, Leonie R Salzburger, Susanne Klein, Kang Han, Sascha W Weyer, Ann-Kristina Fritz and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Amyloid Precursor Protein Regulates Synaptic Transmission at Medial Perforant Path Synapses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Protein Interactome of Amyloid-β as a Therapeutic Target.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Max C RichterInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Susann LudewigZoological Institute, Division of Cellular Neurobiology, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Alex WinschelDepartment of Biology, Neurophysiology und Neurosensory Systems, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Tobias AbelPaul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI), Langen, Germany.
Charlotte BoldInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leonie R SalzburgerZoological Institute, Division of Cellular Neurobiology, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Susanne KleinInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kang HanInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sascha W WeyerInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ann-Kristina FritzInstitute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bodo LaubeDepartment of Biology, Neurophysiology und Neurosensory Systems, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
David P WolferInstitute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian J BuchholzPaul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI), Langen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-7345
Martin KorteZoological Institute, Division of Cellular Neurobiology, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-5913
Ulrike C MüllerInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany u.mueller@urz.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0587-2575
Heidelberg University · DEPaul Ehrlich Institut · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DETechnische Universität Darmstadt · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that synaptic functions of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which is key to Alzheimer pathogenesis, may be carried out by its secreted ectodomain (APPs). The specific roles of APPsα and APPsβ fragments, generated by non-amyloidogenic or amyloidogenic APP processing, respectively, remain however unclear. Here, we expressed APPsα or APPsβ in the adult brain of conditional double knockout mice (cDKO) lacking APP and the related APLP2. APPsα efficiently rescued deficits in spine density, synaptic plasticity (LTP and PPF), and spatial reference memory of cDKO mice. In contrast, APPsβ failed to show any detectable effects on synaptic plasticity and spine density. The C-terminal 16 amino acids of APPsα (lacking in APPsβ) proved sufficient to facilitate LTP in a mechanism that depends on functional nicotinic α7-nAChRs. Further, APPsα showed high-affinity, allosteric potentiation of heterologously expressed α7-nAChRs in oocytes. Collectively, we identified α7-nAChRs as a crucial physiological receptor specific for APPsα and show distinct

Indexed as

alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsBrainCognitionHippocampusHumansMiceMice, KnockoutNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSpineSynaptic Transmissionalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAlzheimeramyloid precursor proteinnicotinic acetylcholine receptorsoluble APPsαsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID29661886
PMCPMC5983155
OpenAlexW2801817490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.