Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661655›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2018

Reprint of Using ecological momentary assessments to predict relapse after adult substance use treatment.

Christy K Scott, Michael L Dennis, David H Gustafson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06629493 (Feasibility and Effects of Activity Trackers Among Alcohol Users Receiving In-patient Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06629493 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effects of Activity Trackers Among Alcohol Users Receiving In-patient Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OviedoRan2022 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsSubstance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)ArmsFitbit Versa 3, In-patient alcohol use disorder treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christy K ScottLighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, 221 W. Walton, Chicago, IL 60610, USA.
Michael L DennisLighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Dr., Normal, IL 61761, USA. Electronic address: mdennis@chestnut.org.
David H GustafsonCenter for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Chestnut Health Systems · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key component of relapse prevention is to self-monitor the internal (feelings or cravings) and external (people, places, activities) factors associated with relapse. Smartphones can deliver ecological momentary assessments (EMA) to help individuals self-monitor. The purpose of this exploratory study was to develop a model for predicting an individual's risk of future substance use after each EMA and validate it using a multi-level model controlling for repeated measures on persons.

methodsData are from 21,897 observations from 43 adults following their initial episode of substance use treatment in Chicago from 2015 to 2016. Participants were provided smartphones for six months and asked to complete two to three minute EMAs at five random times per day (81% completion). In any given EMA, 2.7% reported substance use and 8% reported any use in the next five completed EMA. Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) was used to classify EMAs into six levels of risk and then validated with a hierarchical linear model (HLM).

resultsThe major predictors of substance use in the next five completed EMAs were substance use pattern over the current and prior five EMAs (no recent/current use, either recent or current use [but not both], continued use [both recent and current]), negative affect (feelings), and craving (rating). Negative affect was important for EMAs with no current or recent use reported; craving was important for EMAs with either recent or current use; and neither mattered for EMAs with continued use. The CHAID gradated EMA risk from 0.7% to 36.6% of the next five completed EMAs with substance use reported. It also gradated risk of "any" use in the next five completed EMAs from 3% to 82%.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the potential of using smartphone-based EMAs to monitor and provide feedback for relapse prevention in future studies.

Indexed as

Ecological momentary assessmentEMARecoveryRelapse preventionSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID29661655
OpenAlexW2795423416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.