Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661615›Full record

ReviewHearing research2018

A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Curtis J Billings, Brandon M Madsen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parallel Age-Related Cochlear Neural Degeneration and Cortical Gain Adaptation in Normal-Hearing Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Curtis J BillingsNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road (NCRAR), Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: curtis.billings2@va.gov.
Brandon M MadsenNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road (NCRAR), Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

The Brain-Behavior Relationship: Age, Hearing, and Their Effects on Understanding Speech in NoiseR01DC015240 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BILLINGS, CURTIS J · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in NoiseR03DC010914 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BILLINGS, CURTIS J · 2011 to 2013
$369k
Using Electrophysiology to Complement Speech Understanding-in-Noise MeasuresI01RX002139 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BILLINGS, CURTIS J · 2017 to 2020
–
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015240NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC010914RRD VA I01 RX002139RRD VA IK2 RX000714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding speech in background noise is often more difficult for individuals who are older and have hearing impairment than for younger, normal-hearing individuals. In fact, speech-understanding abilities among older individuals with hearing impairment varies greatly. Researchers have hypothesized that some of that variability can be explained by how the brain encodes speech signals in the presence of noise, and that brain measures may be useful for predicting behavioral performance in difficult-to-test patients. In a series of experiments, we have explored the effects of age and hearing impairment in both brain and behavioral domains with the goal of using brain measures to improve our understanding of speech-in-noise difficulties. The behavioral measures examined showed effect sizes for hearing impairment that were 6-10 dB larger than the effects of age when tested in steady-state noise, whereas electrophysiological age effects were similar in magnitude to those of hearing impairment. Both age and hearing status influence neural responses to speech as well as speech understanding in background noise. These effects can in turn be modulated by other factors, such as the characteristics of the background noise itself. Finally, the use of electrophysiology to predict performance on receptive speech-in-noise tasks holds promise, demonstrating root-mean-square prediction errors as small as 1-2 dB. An important next step in this field of inquiry is to sample the aging and hearing impairment variables continuously (rather than categorically) - across the whole lifespan and audiogram - to improve effect estimates.

Indexed as

HearingPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAge FactorsAgingAudiometry, SpeechAuditory PathwaysCerebral CortexComprehensionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearing LossHumansNoisePersons with Hearing DisabilitiesPsychoacousticsAgingBrain and behaviorCorrelationCortical auditory evoked potentialsHearing impairmentHearing lossPredictionSpeech in noiseSpeech perception in noise

Identifiers

PMID29661615
PMCPMC6636926
OpenAlexW2794548715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.