ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2018
Anisotropy and Spatial Heterogeneity in Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters: Relevance to the Study of the Human Cervix.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved imaging interfaces on a co-registered ultrasound and optical microscopy multiscale system.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- The (ProteUS) Anisotropy Effect in Deep Fascia Ultrasonography: The Impact of Probe Angulation on Echogenicity and Thickness Assessments.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Collagen Remodeling during a Murine Pregnancy.ACS photonics · 2024Article
- A Geometric Model of Ultrasound Backscatter to Describe Microstructural Anisotropy of Tissue.Ultrasonic imaging · 2023Article
- Analytic Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Optimization of Ultrasound Backscatter Spectroscopy to Assess Neurotoxic Effects of Anesthesia in the Newborn Non-human Primate Brain.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Detects Smooth Muscle Activity at the Cervical Internal Os in Vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Based on the Backscattered Echo Power Signal as Biomarkers of Cervical Remodeling: A Longitudinal Study in the Pregnant Rhesus Macaque.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers Based on Backscattered Acoustic Power: Potential for Quantifying Remodeling of the Human Cervix during Pregnancy.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imaging biomarkers based on quantitative ultrasound can offer valuable information about properties that inform tissue function and behavior such as microstructural organization (e.g., collagen alignment) and viscoelasticity (i.e., compliance). For example, the cervix feels softer as its microstructure remodels during pregnancy, an increase in compliance that can be objectively quantified with shear wave speed and therefore shear wave speed estimation is a potential biomarker of cervical remodeling. Other proposed biomarkers include parameters derived from the backscattered echo signal, such as attenuation and backscattered power loss, because such parameters can provide insight into tissue microstructural alignment and organization. Of these, attenuation values for the pregnant cervix have been reported, but large estimate variance reduces their clinical value. That said, parameter estimates based on the backscattered echo signal may be incorrect if assumptions they rely on, such as tissue isotropy and homogeneity, are violated. For that reason, we explored backscatter and attenuation parameters as potential biomarkers of cervical remodeling via careful investigation of the assumptions of isotropy and homogeneity in cervical tissue. Specifically, we estimated the angle- and spatial-dependence of parameters of backscattered power and acoustic attenuation in the ex vivo human cervix, using the reference phantom method and electronic steering of the ultrasound beam. We found that estimates are anisotropic and spatially heterogeneous, presumably because the tissue itself is anisotropic and heterogeneous. We conclude that appropriate interpretation of imaging biomarkers of cervical remodeling must account for tissue anisotropy and heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.