Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661215›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2018

Recovering parasites from mummies and coprolites: an epidemiological approach.

Morgana Camacho, Adauto Araújo, Johnica Morrow, Jane Buikstra, Karl Reinhard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
80.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reconstructing the history of helminth prevalence in the UK.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal and Spatial Distribution ofThe Korean journal of parasitology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Morgana CamachoEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21041-210, Brazil.
Adauto AraújoEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21041-210, Brazil.
Johnica MorrowDepartment of Physical & Life Sciences, Chadron State College, 1000 Main Street, Chadron, NE, 69337, USA.
Jane BuikstraSchool of Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Karl ReinhardPathoecology Laboratory, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0987, USA. kreinhard1@unl.edu.
Arizona State University · USChadron State College · USEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Ciência sem Fronteiras E-26/102.735/2012Fundação Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR) OK FAPERJ MG 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of archaeological parasitology, researchers have long documented the distribution of parasites in archaeological time and space through the analysis of coprolites and human remains. This area of research defined the origin and migration of parasites through presence/absence studies. By the end of the 20th century, the field of pathoecology had emerged as researchers developed an interest in the ancient ecology of parasite transmission. Supporting studies were conducted to establish the relationships between parasites and humans, including cultural, subsistence, and ecological reconstructions. Parasite prevalence data were collected to infer the impact of parasitism on human health. In the last few decades, a paleoepidemiological approach has emerged with a focus on applying statistical techniques for quantification. The application of egg per gram (EPG) quantification methods provide data about parasites' prevalence in ancient populations and also identify the pathological potential that parasitism presented in different time periods and geographic places. Herein, we compare the methods used in several laboratories for reporting parasite prevalence and EPG quantification. We present newer quantification methods to explore patterns of parasite overdispersion among ancient people. These new methods will be able to produce more realistic measures of parasite infections among people of the past. These measures allow researchers to compare epidemiological patterns in both ancient and modern populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeologyFecesFossilsHumansMummiesParasitesParasitologyCoproliteEpidemiologyOverdispersionParasiteQuantification

Identifiers

PMID29661215
PMCPMC5902992
OpenAlexW2799605839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.