Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661193›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018

Simulation of phase contrast angiography for renal arterial models.

Artur Klepaczko, Piotr Szczypiński, Michał Strzelecki, Ludomir Stefańczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Artur KlepaczkoMedical Electronics Division, Institute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, ul. Wólczańska 211/215, 90-924, Lodz, Poland. aklepaczko@p.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-5870
Piotr SzczypińskiMedical Electronics Division, Institute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, ul. Wólczańska 211/215, 90-924, Lodz, Poland.
Michał StrzeleckiMedical Electronics Division, Institute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, ul. Wólczańska 211/215, 90-924, Lodz, Poland.
Ludomir StefańczykDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, ul. Kopcińskiego 22, 90-153, Lodz, Poland.
Lodz University of Technology · PLMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki (PL) 2014/15/B/ST7/05227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of versatile magnetic resonance acquisition techniques there arises a need for more advanced imaging simulation tools to enable adequate image appearance prediction, measurement sequence design and testing thereof. Recently, there is a growing interest in phase contrast angiography (PCA) sequence due to the capabilities of blood flow quantification that it offers. Moreover, as it is a non-contrast enhanced protocol, it has become an attractive option in areas, where usage of invasive contrast agents is not indifferent for the imaged tissue. Monitoring of the kidney function is an example of such an application.

resultsWe present a computer framework for simulation of the PCA protocol, both conventional and accelerated with echo-planar imaging (EPI) readout, and its application to the numerical models of kidney vasculatures. Eight patient-specific renal arterial trees were reconstructed following vessel segmentation in real computed tomography angiograms. In addition, a synthetic model was designed using a vascular tree growth simulation algorithm. The results embrace a series of synthetic PCA images of the renal arterial trees giving insight into the image formation and quantification of kidney hemodynamics.

conclusionsThe designed simulation framework enables quantification of the PCA measurement error in relation to ground-truth flow velocity data. The mean velocity measurement error for the reconstructed renal arterial trees range from 1.5 to 12.8% of the aliasing velocity value, depending on image resolution and flip angle. No statistically significant difference was observed between measurements obtained using EPI with a number of echos (NETL) = 4 and conventional PCA. In case of higher NETL factors peak velocity values can be underestimated up to 34%.

Indexed as

AngiographyModels, BiologicalArteriesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyPrincipal Component AnalysisBlood flow simulationKidney vasculature modelingMRI simulationPhase contrast angiographyVessel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID29661193
PMCPMC5902949
OpenAlexW2804775736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.