Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661183›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Alison Hammond, Yeliz Prior, Sarah Tyson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04619173 (Additional Effects of Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04619173 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Additional Effects of Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsFrozen ShoulderArmsThoracic manipulation, Conventional physical therapy Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Validation of a Malaysian Blood Donor's Satisfaction Questionnaire.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alison HammondCentre for Health Sciences Research (OT), L701 Allerton, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. a.hammond@salford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5266-9991
Yeliz PriorCentre for Health Sciences Research (OT), L701 Allerton, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Sarah TysonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Salford · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20031Versus Arthritis 20031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is widely used in the UK, no British English version is available. The aim of this study was to linguistically validate the DASH into British English and then test the reliability and validity of the British English DASH, (including the Work and Sport/Music DASH) and QuickDASH, in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsThe DASH was forward translated, reviewed by an expert panel and cognitive debriefing interviews undertaken with 31 people with RA. Content validity was evaluated using the ICF Core Set for RA. Participants with RA (n = 340) then completed the DASH, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF36v2) and Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand (MAPHAND). We examined internal consistency and concurrent validity for the DASH, Work and Sport/Music DASH modules and QuickDASH. Participants repeated the DASH to assess test-retest reliability.

resultsMinor wording changes were made as required. The DASH addresses a quarter of Body Function and half of Activities and Participation codes in the ICF RA Core Set. Internal consistency for DASH scales were consistent with individual use (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94-0.98). Concurrent validity was strong with the HAQ (r

conclusionsBritish English versions of the DASH, QuickDASH and Work and Sport/Music modules are now available to evaluate upper limb disabilities in the UK. The DASH, QuickDASH, Work and Sport/Music modules are reliable and valid to use in clinical practice and research with British people with RA.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationLanguagePersons with DisabilitiesAgedArmArthritis, RheumatoidEnglandFemaleHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsShoulderSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient reported outcomesRehabilitationRheumatoid arthritisUpper limb assessment

Identifiers

PMID29661183
PMCPMC5902839
OpenAlexW2801735893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.