Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29661130›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2018

A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens.

Martijn F L Derks, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Mirte Bosse, Jeroen Visscher, Katrijn Peeters, Marco C A M Bink, Addie Vereijken, Christian Gross, Dick de Ridder, Marcel J T Reinders and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Missense Mutation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn F L DerksWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. martijn.derks@wur.nl.
Hendrik-Jan MegensWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mirte BosseWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen VisscherHendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Katrijn PeetersHendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Marco C A M BinkHendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Addie VereijkenHendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Christian GrossBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 633, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 633, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel J T ReindersDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Martien A M GroenenWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLHendrix Genetics (Netherlands) · NLDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

Horizon 2020 677353Horizon 2020 IMAGE (Innovative Management of Animal Genetic resources)Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 14283: From sequence to phenotype: detecting deleterious variation by prediction of functionality.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeleterious genetic variation can increase in frequency as a result of mutations, genetic drift, and genetic hitchhiking. Although individual effects are often small, the cumulative effect of deleterious genetic variation can impact population fitness substantially. In this study, we examined the genome of commercial purebred chicken lines for deleterious and functional variations, combining genotype and whole-genome sequence data.

resultsWe analysed over 22,000 animals that were genotyped on a 60 K SNP chip from four purebred lines (two white egg and two brown egg layer lines) and two crossbred lines. We identified 79 haplotypes that showed a significant deficit in homozygous carriers. This deficit was assumed to stem from haplotypes that potentially harbour lethal recessive variations. To identify potentially deleterious mutations, a catalogue of over 10 million variants was derived from 250 whole-genome sequenced animals from three purebred white-egg layer lines. Out of 4219 putative deleterious variants, 152 mutations were identified that likely induce embryonic lethality in the homozygous state. Inferred deleterious variation showed evidence of purifying selection and deleterious alleles were generally overrepresented in regions of low recombination. Finally, we found evidence that mutations, which were inferred to be evolutionally intolerant, likely have positive effects in commercial chicken populations.

conclusionsWe present a comprehensive genomic perspective on deleterious and functional genetic variation in egg layer breeding lines, which are under intensive selection and characterized by a small effective population size. We show that deleterious variation is subject to purifying selection and that there is a positive relationship between recombination rate and purging efficiency. In addition, multiple putative functional coding variants were discovered in selective sweep regions, which are likely under positive selection. Together, this study provides a unique molecular perspective on functional and deleterious variation in commercial egg-laying chickens, which can enhance current genomic breeding practices to lower the frequency of undesirable variants in the population.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence DeletionAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBreedingChickensGenetic VariationGenotypeHaplotypesRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29661130
PMCPMC5902831
OpenAlexW2801863610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.