Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29660842›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine2019

Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation.

Victor Olariu, Carsten Peterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Discrete Logic Modeling of Cell Signaling Pathways.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulation of stress-induced hematopoiesis.Current opinion in hematology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Causal Gene Regulatory Network Modeling and Genomics: Second-Generation Challenges.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2019
    Article
  15. Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor OlariuDepartment of Computational Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Carsten PetersonDepartment of Computational Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Kinetic modeling and single-cell molecular mechanisms of early T-cell commitmentR01HL119102 · NHLBI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PETERSON, CARSTEN, ROTHENBERG, ELLEN V. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119102NIH HHS 18B-1095882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cell and molecular biology is becoming increasingly quantitative, there is an upsurge of interest in mechanistic modeling at different levels of resolution. Such models mostly concern kinetics and include gene and protein interactions as well as cell population dynamics. The final goal of these models is to provide experimental predictions, which is now taking on. However, even without matured predictions, kinetic models serve the purpose of compressing a plurality of experimental results into something that can empower the data interpretation, and importantly, suggesting new experiments by turning "knobs" in silico. Once formulated, kinetic models can be executed in terms of molecular rate equations for concentrations or by stochastic simulations when only a limited number of copies are involved. Developmental processes, in particular those of stem and progenitor cell commitments, are not only topical but also particularly suitable for kinetic modeling due to the finite number of key genes involved in cellular decisions. Stem and progenitor cell commitment processes have been subject to intense experimental studies over the last decade with some emphasis on embryonic and hematopoietic stem cells. Gene and protein interactions governing these processes can be modeled by binary Boolean rules or by continuous-valued models with interactions set by binding strengths. Conceptual insights along with tested predictions have emerged from such kinetic models. Here we review kinetic modeling efforts applied to stem cell developmental systems with focus on hematopoiesis. We highlight the future challenges including multi-scale models integrating cell dynamical and transcriptional models. This article is categorized under: Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Mechanistic Models Developmental Biology > Stem Cell Biology and Regeneration.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalCell DifferentiationGene Regulatory NetworksHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansKineticsSignal Transductionenergy landscapeshematopoiesisrate equationsreprogrammingstem cellsstochastic simulationssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID29660842
PMCPMC6191385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.