Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29660077›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2018

Immediate Effects of a Single Session of Motor Skill Training on the Lumbar Movement Pattern During a Functional Activity in People With Low Back Pain: A Repeated-Measures Study.

Andrej V Marich, Vanessa M Lanier, Gretchen B Salsich, Catherine E Lang, Linda R Van Dillen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Treatment preference changes after exposure to treatment in adults with chronic low back pain.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Spinal movement impairments in people with acute low back pain.Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Opioid use and social disadvantage in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrej V MarichProgram in Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Vanessa M LanierProgram in Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis.
Gretchen B SalsichDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri.
Catherine E LangProgram in Physical Therapy, Program in Occupational Therapy, and Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis.
Linda R Van DillenProgram in Physical Therapy and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, 4444 Forest Park Blvd, Campus Box 8502, St Louis, MO 63108 (USA).

Funding

Spinal Control during Functional Activities to Improve Low Back Pain OutcomesR01HD047709 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VANDILLEN, LINDA R · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with low back pain (LBP) may display an altered lumbar movement pattern of early lumbar motion compared to people with healthy backs. Modifying this movement pattern during a clinical test decreases pain. It is unknown whether similar effects would be seen during a functional activity. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the lumbar movement patterns before and after motor skill training, effects on pain, and characteristics that influenced the ability to modify movement patterns. Design: The design consisted of a repeated-measures study examining early-phase lumbar excursion in people with LBP during a functional activity test. Methods: Twenty-six people with chronic LBP received motor skill training, and 16 people with healthy backs were recruited as a reference standard. Twenty minutes of motor skill training to decrease early-phase lumbar excursion during the performance of a functional activity were used as a treatment intervention. Early-phase lumbar excursion was measured before and after training. Participants verbally reported increased pain, decreased pain, or no change in pain during performance of the functional activity test movement in relation to their baseline pain. The characteristics of people with LBP that influenced the ability to decrease early-phase lumbar excursion were examined. Results: People with LBP displayed greater early-phase lumbar excursion before training than people with healthy backs (LBP: mean = 11.2°, 95% CI = 9.3°-13.1°; healthy backs: mean = 7.1°, 95% CI = 5.8°-8.4°). Following training, the LBP group showed a decrease in the amount of early-phase lumbar excursion (mean change = 4.1°, 95% CI = 2.4°-5.8°); 91% of people with LBP reported that their pain decreased from baseline following training. The longer the duration of LBP (β = - 0.22) and the more early-phase lumbar excursion before training (β = - 0.82), the greater the change in early-phase lumbar excursion following training. Limitations: The long-term implications of modifying the movement pattern and whether the decrease in pain attained was clinically significant are unknown. Conclusions: People with LBP were able to modify their lumbar movement pattern and decrease their pain with the movement pattern within a single session of motor skill training.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TherapyFemaleHumansLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionMaleMotor SkillsMovementMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID29660077
PMCPMC6692703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.