Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29660002›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018

Convergent Acquisition of Nonembryonic Development in Styelid Ascidians.

Alexandre Alié, Laurel Sky Hiebert, Paul Simion, Marta Scelzo, Maria Mandela Prünster, Sonia Lotito, Frédéric Delsuc, Emmanuel J P Douzery, Christelle Dantec, Patrick Lemaire and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  9. The Hazards of Regeneration: From Morgan's Legacy to Evo-Devo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  10. The Onset of Whole-Body Regeneration inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A redescription ofZooKeys · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexandre AliéSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230 Paris, France.
Laurel Sky HiebertDepartamento de Zoologia - Instituto Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paul SimionISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Marta ScelzoSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230 Paris, France.
Maria Mandela PrünsterSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230 Paris, France.
Sonia LotitoSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230 Paris, France.
Frédéric DelsucISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuel J P DouzeryISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Christelle DantecCRBM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Patrick LemaireCRBM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Sébastien DarrasSorbonne Université, CNRS, Biologie Int[1]egrative des Organismes Marins (BIOM),Observatoire Oc[1]eanologique, Banyuls/Mer, 06230 Paris, France.
Kazuo KawamuraLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.
Federico D BrownDepartamento de Zoologia - Instituto Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stefano TiozzoSorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asexual propagation and whole body regeneration are forms of nonembryonic development (NED) widespread across animal phyla and central in life history and evolutionary diversification of metazoans. Whereas it is challenging to reconstruct the gains or losses of NED at large phylogenetic scale, comparative studies could benefit from being conducted at more restricted taxonomic scale, in groups for which phylogenetic relationships are well established. The ascidian family of Styelidae encompasses strictly sexually reproducing solitary forms as well as colonial species that combine sexual reproduction with different forms of NED. To date, the phylogenetic relationships between colonial and solitary styelids remain controversial and so is the pattern of NED evolution. In this study, we built an original pipeline to combine eight genomes with 18 de novo assembled transcriptomes and constructed data sets of unambiguously orthologous genes. Using a phylogenomic super-matrix of 4,908 genes from these 26 tunicates we provided a robust phylogeny of this family of chordates, which supports two convergent acquisitions of NED. This result prompted us to further describe the budding process in the species Polyandrocarpa zorritensis, leading to the discovery of a novel mechanism of asexual development. Whereas the pipeline and the data sets produced can be used for further phylogenetic reconstructions in tunicates, the phylogeny provided here sets an evolutionary framework for future experimental studies on the emergence and disappearance of complex characters such as asexual propagation and whole body regeneration.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsReproduction, AsexualRNA, Ribosomal, 18STranscriptomeUrochordataRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID29660002
PMCPMC5995219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.