Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29659904›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2018

Coinfection with Zika Virus (ZIKV) and Dengue Virus Results in Preferential ZIKV Transmission by Vector Bite to Vertebrate Host.

Barbara Aparecida Chaves, Alessandra Silva Orfano, Paula Monalisa Nogueira, Nilton Barnabe Rodrigues, Thais Bonifácio Campolina, Rafael Nacif-Pimenta, Ana Clara Araújo Machado Pires, Ademir Bentes Vieira Júnior, Andréia da Costa Paz, Evelyn Beatriz da Costa Vaz and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The consequence of simultaneous and sequential coinfections ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Zika Virus: A Tale of Two Lineages.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Barbara Aparecida ChavesInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Alessandra Silva OrfanoInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Paula Monalisa NogueiraInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Nilton Barnabe RodriguesInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Thais Bonifácio CampolinaInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Rafael Nacif-PimentaInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Ana Clara Araújo Machado PiresInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte.
Ademir Bentes Vieira JúniorInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Andréia da Costa PazInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Evelyn Beatriz da Costa VazInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Maria das Graças Vale Barbosa GuerraInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Breno Melo SilvaDepartmento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais.
Fabrício Freire de MeloInstituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brasil.
Douglas Eric NorrisThe W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marcus Vinícius Guimarães de LacerdaInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Paulo Filemon Paolucci PimentaInstituto de Pequisa Clínicas Carlos Borborema, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus.
Nágila Francinete Costa SecundinoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Tropical, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several tropical cities are permissive to Aedes aegypti and dengue virus (DENV) endemicity and have allowed for invasion and circulation of Zika virus (ZIKV) in the same areas. People living in arbovirus-endemic regions have been simultaneously infected with ≥2 arboviruses. Methods: A. aegypti mosquitoes from Manaus, the capital city of Amazonas State in Brazil, were coinfected with circulating strains of DENV and ZIKV. The coinfected vectors were allowed to bite BALB/c mice. Results: A. aegypti from Manaus is highly permissive to monoinfection and coinfection with DENV and ZIKV and is capable of cotransmitting both pathogens by bite. Coinfection strongly influences vector competence, favoring transmission of ZIKV to the vertebrate host. Conclusions: This finding suggests that A. aegypti is an efficient vector of ZIKV and that ZIKV would be preferentially transmitted by coinfected A. aegypti. Coinfection in the vector population should be considered a new critical epidemiological factor and may represent a major public health challenge.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousAedesAnimalsBrazilCitiesCoinfectionDengueDengue VirusDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMice, Inbred BALB CMosquito VectorsZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID29659904
PMCPMC6047447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.