ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Does a Consumer-Targeted Deprescribing Intervention Compromise Patient-Healthcare Provider Trust?
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to reducing anticholinergic burden: a qualitative systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Pooled it
- Government Direct-to-Consumer Education to Reduce Prescription Opioid Use: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Patient-Reported Barriers and Enablers to Deprescribing Recommendations During a Clinical Trial (Shed-MEDS).The Gerontologist · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Deprescribing Decisions in Swiss Primary Care: Low Concordance Between General Practitioners and Older Adults.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Facilitators and barriers to the deprescribing of benzodiazepines and Z-drug hypnotics in patients under 65 on adult mental health wards.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Physician-reported barriers and facilitators to thyroid hormone deprescribing in older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Strategies to guide the successful implementation of deprescribing in community practice: Lessons learned from the front line.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2024Article
- Healthcare provider-related perceptions toward deprescribing inappropriate medications among older adult outpatients.PloS one · 2024Article
- Prescribing cascades in persons with Alzheimer's disease: engaging patients, caregivers, and providers in a qualitative evaluation of print educational materials.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
- Deprescribing conversations: a closer look at prescriber-patient communication.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2018Article
- Patient-Oriented Policies To Reduce The Harmful Effects Of Medication On Seniors' Brain Function.The Public policy and aging report · 2018Article
- Deprescribing-A Few Steps Further.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- How to change workflow to enhance implementation of professional services in community pharmacies: A deprescribing case study.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One in four community-dwelling older adults is prescribed an inappropriate medication. Educational interventions aimed at patients to reduce inappropriate medications may cause patients to question their prescriber’s judgment. The objective of this study was to determine whether a patient-focused deprescribing intervention compromised trust between older adults and their healthcare providers. An educational brochure was distributed to community-dwelling older adults by community pharmacists in order to trigger deprescribing conversations. At baseline and 6-months post-intervention, participants completed the Primary Care Assessment Survey, which measures patient trust in doctors and pharmacists. Changes in trust were ascertained post-intervention. Proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and logistic regression were used to determine a shift in trust and associated predictors. 352 participants responded to the questionnaire at both time points. The majority of participants had no change or gained trust in their doctors for items related to the choice of medical care (78.5%, 95% CI = 74.2–82.8), communication transparency (75.4%, 95% CI = 70.7–79.8), and overall trust (81.9%, 95% CI = 77.9–86.0). Similar results were obtained for participants’ perceptions of their pharmacists, with trust remaining intact for items related to the choice of medical care (79.4%, 95% CI = 75.3–83.9), transparency in communicating (82.0%, 95% CI = 78.0–86.1), and overall trust (81.6%, 95% CI = 77.5–85.7). Neither age, sex nor the medication class targeted for deprescribing was associated with a loss of trust. Overall, the results indicate that patient-focused deprescribing interventions do not shift patients’ trust in their healthcare providers in a negative direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.