Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29659003›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018

State of Science: Bridging the Science-Practice Gap in Aging, Dementia and Mental Health.

Christopher M Callahan, Daniel R Bateman, Sophia Wang, Malaz A Boustani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dissemination of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model for Dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Enhancing early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care with the TabCAT-BHA.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The methodology of the Agile Nudge University.Frontiers in health services · 2023
    Article
  14. Geropsychiatric Nursing Leadership in Long-Term Care.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Brain Health Living Labs.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Advances in geropsychiatric nursing: A decade in review.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher M CallahanCenter for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Daniel R BatemanCenter for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Sophia WangDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Malaz A BoustaniCenter for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

Brain Health Patient Safety Learning LaboratoryP30HS024384 · AHRQ · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
State of the Future in Global Aging, Dementia & Mental Health: Bridging Leadership, Science, Practice and PolicyR13AG056140 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEPHENS, CAROLINE · 2017 to 2017
$40k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024384NIA NIH HHS R13 AG056140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The workforce available to care for older adults has not kept pace with the need. In response to workforce limitations and the growing complexity of healthcare, scientists have tested new models of care that redesign clinical practice. This article describes why new models of care in aging, dementia, and mental health diffuse inadequately into the healthcare systems and communities where they might benefit older adults. We review a general framework for the diffusion of innovations and highlight the importance of other features of innovations that deter or facilitate diffusion. Although scientists often focus on generating evidence-based innovations, end-users apply their own criteria to determine an innovation's value. In 1962, Rogers suggested six features of an innovation that facilitate or deter diffusion suggested: relative advantage, compatibility with the existing environment, ease or difficulty of implementation, trial-ability or ability to "test drive", adaptability, and observed effectiveness. We describe examples of models of care in aging, dementia and mental health that enjoy a modicum of diffusion into practice and place the features of these models in the context of deterrents and facilitators for diffusion. Developers of models of care in aging, dementia, and mental health typically fail to incorporate the complexities of health systems, the barriers to diffusion, and the role of emotion into design considerations of new models. We describe agile implementation as a strategy to facilitate the speed and scale of diffusion in the setting of complex adaptive systems, social networks, and dynamic macroenvironments.

Indexed as

DementiaProfessional Practice GapsAgedAgingDelivery of Health CareDiffusion of InnovationHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth WorkforceHumansMental DisordersMental HealthModels, TheoreticalPatient CareUnited Statesdementiadiffusionimplementationmental healthmodels of care

Identifiers

PMID29659003
PMCPMC6690193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.