Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29658776›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2018

Toward Recovering Allele-specific Cancer Genome Graphs.

Ashok Rajaraman, Jian Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashok RajaramanComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jian MaComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative GenomicsR01HG007352 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MA, JIAN · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
Scalable Cancer Genomics via Nanocoding and SequencingR33CA182360 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MA, JIAN, SCHWARTZ, DAVID C. · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated analysis of structural variants (SVs) and copy number alterations in aneuploid cancer genomes is key to understanding tumor genome complexity. A recently developed algorithm, Weaver, can estimate, for the first time, allele-specific copy number of SVs and their interconnectivity in aneuploid cancer genomes. However, one major limitation is that not all SVs identified by Weaver are phased. In this article, we develop a general convex programming framework that predicts the interconnectivity of unphased SVs with possibly noisy allele-specific copy number estimations as input. We demonstrated through applications to both simulated data and HeLa whole-genome sequencing data that our method is robust to the noise in the input copy numbers and can predict SV phasings with high specificity. We found that our method can make consistent predictions with Weaver even if a large proportion of the input variants are unphased. We also applied our method to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ovarian cancer whole-genome sequencing samples to phase SVs left unphased by Weaver. Our work provides an important new algorithmic framework for recovering more complete allele-specific cancer genome graphs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAllelesDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanGenomicsGenomic Structural VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsallele specificcancer genome graphcopy number alterationstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID29658776
PMCPMC6067097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.