Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29658164›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2018

Concise Review: Bipotent Megakaryocytic-Erythroid Progenitors: Concepts and Controversies.

Juliana Xavier-Ferrucio, Diane S Krause

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Human CD34Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The role of GATA2 in adult hematopoiesis and cell fate determination.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juliana Xavier-FerrucioYale Stem Cell Center and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Diane S KrauseYale Stem Cell Center and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-6947

Funding

Yale Cooperative Hematology Specialized Core CenterU54DK106857 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN HWA, Diane S Krause · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
Mechanisms of megakaryocyte maturationR01DK094934 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUSE, DIANE S · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Megakaryocyte erythroid progenitor fate specificationR01DK114031 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUSE, DIANE S · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094934NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114031NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells maintain blood formation throughout our lifetime by undergoing long- and short-term self-renewal, respectively. As progenitor cells progress through the hematopoiesis process, their differentiation capabilities narrow, such that the precursors become committed to only one or two lineages. This Review focuses on recent advances in the identification and characterization of bipotent megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors (MEP), the cells that can further produce two completely different functional outputs: platelets and red blood cells. The existence of MEP has sparked controversy as studies describing the requirement for this intermediate progenitor stage prior to commitment to the erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages have been potentially contradictory. Interpretation of these studies is complicated by the variety of species, cell sources, and analytical approaches used along with inherent challenges in the continuum of hematopoiesis, where hematopoietic progenitors do not stop at discrete steps on single paths as classically drawn in hematopoietic hierarchy models. With the goal of improving our understanding of human hematopoiesis, we discuss findings in both human and murine cells. Based on these data, MEP clearly represent a transitional stage of differentiation in at least one route to the generation of both megakaryocytes and erythroid cells. Stem Cells 2018;36:1138-1145.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineageErythropoiesisHumansMegakaryocyte-Erythroid Progenitor CellsErythroid progenitorsHematopoietic progenitorsHematopoietic stem cellsMegakaryocyte

Identifiers

PMID29658164
PMCPMC6105498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.