ArticleHealth & justice2018
Improving the evidence base for services working with youth at-risk of involvement in the criminal justice system: developing a standardised program approach.
Article in Health & justice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- A Cluster-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Impact Evaluation of a Pragmatic Implementation Process for Improving the Cultural Responsiveness of Non-Aboriginal Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- An Aboriginal community-led approach to reducing alcohol-related harm: A multiple baseline, stepped wedge evaluation.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Utilising the Implementation of Integrated Care to Develop a Pragmatic Framework for the Sustained Uptake of Service Innovations (SUSI).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Impact and Return on Investment of the Take Kare Safe Space Program-A Harm Reduction Strategy Implemented in Sydney, Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Formative process evaluation of a guideline-driven process for improving the cultural responsiveness of alcohol and drug treatment services.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Testing an evidence-based drug abuse and violence preventive approach adapted for youth in juvenile justice diversionary settings.Health & justice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYoung people who engage in multiple risk behaviour (high-risk young people) such as substance abuse, antisocial behaviour, low engagement in education and employment, self-harm or suicide ideation are more likely to experience serious harms later in life including homelessness, incarceration, violence and premature death. In addition to personal disadvantage, these harms represent an avoidable social and economic cost to society. Despite these harms, there is insufficient evidence about how to improve outcomes for high-risk young people. A key reason for this is a lack of standardisation in the way in which programs provided by services are defined and evaluated.
methodsThis paper describes the development of a standardised intervention model for high-risk young people. The model can be used by service providers to achieve greater standardisation across their programs, outcomes and outcome measures. To demonstrate its feasibility, the model is applied to an existing program for high-risk young people.
conclusionsThe development and uptake of a standardised intervention model for these programs will help to more rapidly develop a larger and more rigorous evidence-base to improve outcomes for high-risk young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.