Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29657805›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

A longitudinal study of phenotypic changes in early domestication of house mice.

Madeleine Geiger, Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra, Anna K Lindholm

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The mammalian brain under domestication: Discovering patterns after a century of old and new analyses.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Human domestication and the roles of human agency in human evolution.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Maladaptation in feral and domesticated animals.Evolutionary applications · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madeleine GeigerPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-6663
Marcelo R Sánchez-VillagraPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Strasse 4, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7587-3648
Anna K LindholmDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-9769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similar phenotypic changes occur across many species as a result of domestication, e.g. in pigmentation and snout size. Experimental studies of domestication have concentrated on intense and directed selection regimes, while conditions that approximate the commensal and indirect interactions with humans have not been explored. We examine long-term data on a free-living population of wild house mice that have been indirectly selected for tameness by regular exposure to humans. In the course of a decade, this mouse population exhibited significantly increased occurrence of white patches of fur and decreased head length. These phenotypic changes fit to the predictions of the 'domestication syndrome'.

Indexed as

commensalismdomestication syndromeevolutionary ratehumanpigmentationtameness

Identifiers

PMID29657805
PMCPMC5882729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.