Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29657683›Full record

ArticleOman medical journal2018

Radiation Protection Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) in Interventional Radiology.

Fatemeh Shabani, Hadi Hasanzadeh, Alireza Emadi, Majid Mirmohammadkhani, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi, Ali Abedelahi, Mitra Bokharaeian, Hamed Masoumi, Danial Seifi, Tahereh Khani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors Affecting Radiation Protection Behaviors among Emergency Room Nurses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fatemeh ShabaniStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Hadi HasanzadehCancer Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Alireza EmadiDeputy of Research and Technology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Majid MirmohammadkhaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Ahmad Bitarafan-RajabiEchocardiography Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
Ali AbedelahiDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mitra BokharaeianStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Hamed MasoumiStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Danial SeifiStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Tahereh KhaniStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Mohamad SanchooliStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Shima MoshfeghStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Abbas ZiariSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDue to increasing cardiac disease and its mortality rate, the frequency of cardiac imaging has grown and, as a result, interventional cardiologists potentially receive high radiation doses in cardiac examinations. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) level of radiation protection (RP) among interventional radiology staff in Iranian health care centers across the country.

methodsWe used a validated questionnaire survey consisting of 30 multiple-choice questions to perform a cross-sectional study. Participants were healthcare personnel working professionally with radiation at different levels (i.e., secretary, radiology technologists, nurse, and physician). The questionnaire was divided into three sections to assess KAP regarding RP.

resultsSignificant differences exist in RP KAP mean scores based on educational age

conclusionsEducational and practice age, sex, type of hospital, and geographical region affect he KAP of interventional radiology staff regarding RP. Since many of the subjective radiation harms for both medical team and patients, this can be easily controlled and prevented; a checkup for personnel of interventional radiology departments, considering samples from different parts of the country with different levels of education, continuous training, and practical courses may help map the status of KAP. The results of this study may also help authorized health physics officers design strategic plans to enhance the quality of such services in radiation departments.

Indexed as

AttitudeInterventional RadiologyKnowledgeRadiation Protection

Identifiers

PMID29657683
PMCPMC5889843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.