ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry
Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials.
Article in European journal of dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effect of polymerization mode and LED light-curing units on the shear bond strength of an alkasite restorative material to dentin.Odontology · 2026Article
- Mechanical Enhancement for Longevity of Glass Ionomer Cement Using Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Study on Microhardness and Wear Resistance.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of wear resistance in 3D printed temporary restorative material using two different printing technologies" - An in vitro study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Tooth Enamel Abrasion and Roughness Using Toothpaste with and Without Activated Charcoal: An SEM Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Effect of erosive solutions and thermal cycling on the surface properties of universal injectable and regular consistency resin composites.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Wear resistance of orthodontic attachments: a comparative analysis of different composite resins in clear aligner therapy.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Article
- The Effect of Usage of Antiasthmatic Inhalers on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Investigation of the wear resistance of different artificial teeth materials in removable dentures.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- A comparative evaluation of mechanical wear of adhesives used for bonded retainers that underwent brushing for 1 hour under 36 mm of linear action, using computer-aided 3D scan-an in vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Assessment of effect of accelerated aging on interim fixed dental materials using digital technologies.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2022Article
- Development of a Hybrid Biomimetic Enamel-Biocomposite Interface and a Study of Its Molecular Features Using Synchrotron Submicron ATR-FTIR Microspectroscopy and Multivariate Analysis Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Effect of Salinized Nano ZrOPolymers · 2022Article
- Structural, Physical, and Mechanical Analysis of ZnO and TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.The Saudi dental journal · 2021Article
- Effect of Modeling Resins on Microhardness of Resin Composites.European journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Structural and Physical Properties of Resin-Based Dental Composites.Polymers · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Abrasivity of a Nanosized Eggshell-Titanium Dioxide on Tooth Enamel Using Atomic Force Microscopy.European journal of dentistry · 2020Article
- Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Polymers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the surface properties (microhardness and wear resistance) of various composites and compomer materials. In addition, the methodologies used for assessing wear resistance were compared. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted using restorative material (Filtek Z250, Filtek Z350, QuiXfil, SureFil SDR, and Dyract XP) to assess wear resistance. A custom-made toothbrush simulator was employed for wear testing. Before and after wear resistance, structural, surface, and physical properties were assessed using various techniques.
resultsStructural changes and mass loss were observed after treatment, whereas no significant difference in terms of microhardness was observed. The correlation between atomic force microscopy (AFM) and profilometer and between wear resistance and filler volume was highly significant. The correlation between wear resistance and microhardness were insignificant.
conclusionsThe AFM presented higher precision compared to optical profilometers at a nanoscale level, but both methods can be used in tandem for a more detailed and precise roughness analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.