Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29657430›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2018

Detection of

Rabehi Sabrina, Hamdi Taha Mossadak, Mamache Bakir, Meghezzi Asma, Boushaba Khaoula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Two novel real-time PCR assays forMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Retinitis & optic neuropathy as a complication of Brucellosis: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Detection and Associated Risk Factors ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rabehi SabrinaDepartment of Veterinary Science, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, University of Batna 1, Batna, Algeria.
Hamdi Taha MossadakResearch Laboratory HASAQ, High National Veterinary School, Algiers, Algeria.
Mamache BakirDepartment of Veterinary Science, Institute of Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, University of Batna 1, Batna, Algeria.
Meghezzi AsmaLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbiology of Constantine Biotechnology Research Center, Constantine, Algeria.
Boushaba KhaoulaLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbiology of Constantine Biotechnology Research Center, Constantine, Algeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to detect MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, 65 milk samples were investigated for the detection of

resultsThe results show that of the 65 DNA samples tested, 2 (3.08%) were positive for

conclusionThe results of the present study indicated that the real-time PCR appears to offer several advantages over serological tests. For this reason, the real-time PCR should be validated on representative numbers of

Indexed as

Brucella sppmilkreal-time polymerase chain reactionseronegative cows

Identifiers

PMID29657430
PMCPMC5891853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.