ArticleVeterinary world2018
Antibacterial activity of fig leaf (
Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Physicochemistry, Nutritional, and Therapeutic Potential ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- A review ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Evaluation of a Fish Gelatin-Based Edible Film Incorporated withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and compressive strength of a dental cement modified using plant extract mixture.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- In vitro evaluation of color characterization, mechanical properties, and antimicrobial activity of 3D-printed provisional dental resin incorporated with Ficus carica (Fig) seed extract.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
aimThis study aimed to determine the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of fig leaf ( MATERIALS AND
methodsA serial dilution method was used to determine the MBC of fig leaf extract on
resultsThe result showed a significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). fig leaf extract at a concentration of 50% showed no bacterial growth, and cell viability at this concentration was 77.7%.
conclusionFig leaf extract has antibacterial effect on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.