ArticleVeterinary world2018
Meta-analysis of classical swine fever prevalence in pigs in India: A 5-year study.
Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global prevalence of hepatitis E virus in swine: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1999-2025).Archives of virology · 2026Pooled it
- Global prevalence of classical swine fever in domestic pigs: an integrative systematic review and meta-analysis.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular Analysis of Classical Swine Fever Virus Associated Field Infections Evidence Novel CSFV Sub Genotype in Tamil Nadu, Southern India.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Application of machine learning models for risk estimation and risk prediction of classical swine fever in Assam, India.Virusdisease · 2023Article
- The first study on analysis of the codon usage bias and evolutionary analysis of the glycoprotein envelope E2 gene of sevenVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Spatial seroprevalence of classical swine fever in India.Tropical animal health and production · 2021Article
- Classical Swine Fever Virus Biology, Clinicopathology, Diagnosis, Vaccines and a Meta-Analysis of Prevalence: A Review from the Indian Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Meta-analysis of the prevalence of livestock diseases in North Eastern Region of India.Veterinary world · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the study was to determine the overall prevalence of classical swine fever (CSF) in pigs in India, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. MATERIALS AND
methodsConsortium for e-Resources in Agriculture, India, Google Scholar, PubMed, annual reports of All India Coordinated Research Project on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance, and All India Animal Disease database of NIVEDI (NADRES) were used for searching and retrieval of CSF prevalence data (seroprevalence, virus antigen, and virus nucleic acid detection) in India using a search strategy combining keywords and related database-specific subject terms from January 2011 to December 2015 in English only.
resultsA total of 22 data reports containing 6,158 samples size from 18 states of India were used for the quantitative synthesis, and overall 37% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.24, 0.51) CSF prevalence in India was estimated. The data were classified into 4 different geographical zones of the country: 20% (95% CI=0.05, 0.55), 31% (95% CI=0.18, 0.47), 55% (95% CI=0.32, 0.76), and 34% (95% CI=0.14, 0.62). CSF prevalence was estimated in northern, eastern, western, and southern regions, respectively.
conclusionThis study indicates that overall prevalence of CSF in India is much lower than individual published reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.