ReviewNon-coding RNA2017
Identification of RNA Polymerase III-Transcribed SINEs at Single-Locus Resolution from RNA Sequencing Data.
Review in Non-coding RNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenovirus small E1A directs activation of Alu transcription at YAP/TEAD- and AP-1-bound enhancers through interactions with the EP400 chromatin remodeler.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Jump-starting life: balancing transposable element co-option and genome integrity in the developing mammalian embryo.EMBO reports · 2024Review
- An RNA Polymerase III General Transcription Factor Engages in Cell Type-Specific Chromatin Looping.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Retrotransposons as Drivers of Mammalian Brain Evolution.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short Interspersed Element (SINE) retrotransposons are one of the most abundant DNA repeat elements in the human genome. They have been found to impact the expression of protein-coding genes, but the possible roles in cell physiology of their noncoding RNAs, generated by RNA polymerase (Pol) III, are just starting to be elucidated. For this reason, Short Interspersed Element (SINE) expression profiling is becoming mandatory to obtain a comprehensive picture of their regulatory roles. However, their repeated nature and frequent location within Pol II-transcribed genes represent a serious obstacle to the identification and quantification of genuine, Pol III-derived SINE transcripts at single-locus resolution on a genomic scale. Among the recent Next Generation Sequencing technologies, only RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) holds the potential to solve these issues, even though both technical and biological matters need to be taken into account. A bioinformatic pipeline has been recently set up that, by exploiting RNA-seq features and knowledge of SINE transcription mechanisms, allows for easy identification and profiling of transcriptionally active genomic loci which are a source of genuine Pol III SINE transcripts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.