Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29657286›Full record

ReviewNon-coding RNA2017

Long Non-Coding RNAs Regulating Immunity in Insects.

Valluri Satyavathi, Rupam Ghosh, Srividya Subramanian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Non-coding RNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Interaction ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances and Future Potential of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Long Non-Coding RNAInsects · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Insects.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  15. Epigenetic Molecular Mechanisms in Insects.Neotropical entomology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valluri SatyavathiCentre of Excellence for Genetics and Genomics of Silkmoths, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500 001, India. vsatya@cdfd.org.in.
Rupam GhoshIndian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal 462023, India. rupam@iiserb.ac.in.
Srividya SubramanianCentre of Excellence for Genetics and Genomics of Silkmoths, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad 500 001, India. srividyas@cdfd.org.in.
Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in modern technology have led to the understanding that not all genetic information is coded into protein and that the genomes of each and every organism including insects produce non-coding RNAs that can control different biological processes. Among RNAs identified in the last decade, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) represent a repertoire of a hidden layer of internal signals that can regulate gene expression in physiological, pathological, and immunological processes. Evidence shows the importance of lncRNAs in the regulation of host-pathogen interactions. In this review, an attempt has been made to view the role of lncRNAs regulating immune responses in insects.

Indexed as

immunityinsectslong non-coding RNAssilkworm

Identifiers

PMID29657286
PMCPMC5832008
OpenAlexW2597309105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.