ReviewNon-coding RNA2016
Recent Advances in Identification of RNA Modifications.
Review in Non-coding RNA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Biological Sequence Classification: A Review on Data and General Methods.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Pseudouridine as a novel biomarker in prostate cancer.Urologic oncology · 2021Review
- Optimizing cardiac ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning via epitranscriptional regulation.Medical hypotheses · 2020Article
- Review
- Non-coding RNAs, the Trojan horse in two-way communication between tumor and stroma in colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA modifications are involved in a broad spectrum of biological and physiological processes. To reveal the functions of RNA modifications, it is important to accurately predict their positions. Although high-throughput experimental techniques have been proposed, they are cost-ineffective. As good complements of experiments, many computational methods have been proposed to predict RNA modification sites in recent years. In this review, we will summarize the existing computational approaches directed at predicting RNA modification sites. We will also discuss the challenges and future perspectives in developing reliable methods for predicting RNA modification sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.