Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29657098›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2018

Inflammatory Responses and Barrier Function of Endothelial Cells Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Oleh V Halaidych, Christian Freund, Francijna van den Hil, Daniela C F Salvatori, Mara Riminucci, Christine L Mummery, Valeria V Orlova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Sourcing cells forFrontiers in medical technology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oleh V HalaidychDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Christian FreundDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Francijna van den HilDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Daniela C F SalvatoriCentral Laboratory Animal Facility, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mara RiminucciDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Christine L MummeryDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Valeria V OrlovaDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333ZC Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: v.orlova@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have reported endothelial cell (EC) derivation from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). However, few have explored their functional properties in depth with respect to line-to-line and batch-to-batch variability and how they relate to primary ECs. We therefore carried out accurate characterization of hiPSC-derived ECs (hiPSC-ECs) from multiple (non-integrating) hiPSC lines and compared them with primary ECs in various functional assays, which included barrier function using real-time impedance spectroscopy with an integrated assay of electric wound healing, endothelia-leukocyte interaction under physiological flow to mimic inflammation and angiogenic responses in in vitro and in vivo assays. Overall, we found many similarities but also some important differences between hiPSC-derived and primary ECs. Assessment of vasculogenic responses in vivo showed little difference between primary ECs and hiPSC-ECs with regard to functional blood vessel formation, which may be important in future regenerative medicine applications requiring vascularization.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD34Biological AssayCell DifferentiationCell LineCell MovementCells, CulturedHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInflammationIntercellular JunctionsNeovascularization, PhysiologicPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Antigens, CD34Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS)endothelial cell barrier functionhiPSC-derived endothelial cells (hiPSC-ECs)human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC)inflammatory responsesjunctional integrityleukocyte adhesion under flowMatrigel plug assaytwo-dimensional vasculogenesis assay

Identifiers

PMID29657098
PMCPMC5995303
OpenAlexW2797632221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.